Perfect homework, blank stares: Why colleges are turning to oral exams to combat AI

Category: Education/Family

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. comeback / ˈkʌmˌbæk / (n.) – a return to being popular or use after a period of not being common or not used
    Example:

    Board games are making a comeback as toy companies use social media to advertise them.


  2. old-fashioned / ˈoʊld ˈfæʃ ənd / (adj.) – relating to something from the past and not commonly used today
    Example:

    He prefers old-fashioned ways of learning, like going to the library to find information instead of searching on the internet.


  3. naively / nɑˈiv li / (adv.) – in a way that shows a lack of experience or understanding of a situation, so someone believes something too easily
    Example:

    He naively believed all the information on the internet was always correct.


  4. troubling / ˈtrʌb əl ɪŋ / (adj.) – causing worry, concern, or anxiety
    Example:

    Teachers reported a troubling increase in stress among young people.


  5. sophisticated / səˈfɪs tɪˌkeɪ tɪd / (adj.) – advanced and complex; developed in a way that is not simple
    Example:

    Modern phones have very sophisticated cameras that take high-quality photos even at night.


Article

Read the text below.

The assignment involves no laptop, no chatbot, and no technology of any kind. In fact, there’s no pen or paper, either. Instead, students in Chris Schaffer’s biomedical engineering class at Cornell University are required to speak directly to an instructor in what he calls an “oral defense.”


It’s a testing method as old as Socrates and making a comeback in the AI age. A growing number of college professors say they are turning to oral exams and combining a variety of old-fashioned and cutting-edge techniques to help address a crisis in higher education. “You won’t be able to AI your way through an oral exam,” says Schaffer, who introduced the oral defense last semester.


Educators are no longer naively wondering if students will use generative AI to do their homework for them. A big question now is how to determine what students are actually learning.


College instructors across the U.S. are noticing troubling new trends as generative artificial intelligence becomes more sophisticated. Take-home essays and other written assignments are coming back perfect. But when students are asked to explain their work, they can’t. The long-term impact of AI use on critical thinking remains to be seen, but educators worry that students increasingly see the hard work of thinking as optional.


At the University of Pennsylvania, Emily Hammer, an associate professor of Middle Eastern Languages and Cultures, now pairs oral exams with written papers in her seminar classes. “It comes across as if we’re trying to prevent cheating,” Hammer says. “That’s not why we’re doing this. We’re doing this because students are actually losing skills, losing cognitive capacity and creativity.”


Hammer forbids AI use on all writing assignments but tells her class she knows she can’t enforce that. However, if they haven’t written their papers themselves, defending the material face-to-face will likely be “a very stressful situation.”


Hammer’s class is part of “a massive shift toward in-person assessments,” both written and oral, at Penn, says Bruce Lenthall, executive director of the school’s Center for Teaching and Learning. The Ivy League school is one of a small but growing number of universities that have started running faculty workshops on oral exams.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Emily Hammer forbids students from using AI on writing assignments, even if she knows it is difficult to fully enforce. Do you think stopping students from using AI tools is a good way to prevent cheating in schools today? Why or why not? What difficulties can teachers face when they try to stop AI use? If you were a college student, would you follow this rule strictly or not? Discuss.
  • If you were an educator, which would you prefer in teaching: using AI tools in education, or going back to more traditional teaching and testing methods? Why do you think so? What can you do to balance the use of AI in education and traditional testing methods? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • In the article, students in a Cornell University class are asked to explain their answers directly to an instructor in an oral exam instead of writing them. Do you think speaking or saying your answers in an exam shows your real understanding better than writing them? Why do you say so? How do you usually feel when you need to explain your ideas out loud? Discuss.
  • Some teachers say students can use AI to complete written assignments, but they may have problems when they need to explain their work face-to-face. How important is it for students to explain their ideas without using notes, AI tools, or other help? What skills might students lose if they only focus on written work? Discuss.