FDA will drop two-study requirement for new drug approvals, aiming to speed access

Category: Health

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. novel / ˈnɒv əl / (adj.) – new and different; describing something that is not usual and has not been seen or done before
    Example:

    The company introduced a novel way to recycle plastic.


  2. long-standing / ˈlɔŋˈstæn dɪŋ / (adj.) – describing something existing for a long time
    Example:

    This festival is a long-standing tradition in our town.


  3. slash / slæʃ / (v.) – to reduce something a lot and quickly
    Example:

    Many supermarkets are slashing prices before the holiday.


  4. directive / dɪˈrɛk tɪv / (n.) – an official instruction or order given by a person or organization with authority
    Example:

    Workers must comply with safety directives at all times.


  5. assured / əˈʃʊərd / (adj.) – confident and self-sure
    Example:

    After practicing many times, he felt more assured about his speech.


Article

Read the text below.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plans to drop its longtime standard of requiring two rigorous studies to win approval for new drugs, the latest change from Trump administration officials vowing to speed up the availability of certain medical products.


Going forward, the FDA’s “default position” will be to require one study for new drugs and other novel health products, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and a top deputy, Dr. Vinay Prasad, wrote in a piece published in the New England Journal of Medicine.


The announcement is the latest example of Makary and his team changing long-standing FDA standards and procedures with the stated goal of slashing bureaucracy and accelerating the availability of new medicines.


Since arriving at the agency last April, Makary has launched a series of directives that he says will shorten FDA reviews, including mandating the use of artificial intelligence by staffers and offering one-month drug assessments for new medications that serve “national interests.” It contrasts with the FDA’s more restrictive approach to other products, including vaccines.


In their piece published in February, Makary and Prasad state that dropping the two-trial requirement reflects modern advances that have made drug research “increasingly precise and scientific.”


“In this setting, overreliance on two trials no longer makes sense,” they write. “In 2026, there are powerful alternative ways to feel assured that our products help people live longer or better than requiring manufacturers to test them yet again.” The FDA officials predicted the shift would lead to “a surge in drug development.”


Dr. Janet Woodcock, the FDA’s former drug director, said the change makes sense and reflects the FDA’s decades-long move toward relying on one trial, combined with supporting evidence, for various life-threatening diseases, including cancer.


“The scientific point is well taken that as we move toward greater understanding of biology and disease, we don’t need to do two trials all the time,” said Woodcock, who led the FDA’s drug center for about 20 years before retiring in 2024.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration plans to make one major study the “default position” for approving new drugs instead of requiring two. Do you think one strong study can be enough to prove a drug is safe and effective? Why or why not? In what situations do you think two studies should still be required? Why? Discuss.
  • Makary has directed staff to use artificial intelligence to shorten FDA reviews. How comfortable are you with AI playing a role in approving medicines? In what areas of life would you not want AI making important decisions (ex. checking transportation for safety, approval of new medicine)? Why? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • FDA officials predict the change will lead to a “surge in drug development.” Do you think easier approval of rules really encourage innovation? Why or why not? In your opinion, could faster approval lower the quality of research? Why do you say so? Discuss.
  • What do you think might be the impact of a “surge in drug development” on the prices of medicine? How can the public benefit from this change? Discuss.