Experts say Trump pullout from UN climate fighting will hurt world and leave US out of green surge

Category: Top Stories

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. withdrawal / wɪðˈdrɔ əl / (n.) – the act of leaving an organization or no longer taking part in an activity
    Example:

    Her sudden withdrawal surprised the team, as she was the leader.


  2. flirt with (something) / flɜrt wɪθ / (phrasal v.) – to be close to something dangerous or serious, often by taking a risk on purpose
    Example:

    The driver flirts with an accident by ignoring the traffic lights and signs.


  3. tipping point / ˈtɪp ɪŋ pɔɪnt / (n.) – the point at which a situation becomes so serious or extreme that a big change or problem happens
    Example:

    If the company loses more customers, it may reach a tipping point and risk closing.


  4. bedrock / ˈbɛdˌrɒk / (n.) – the most basic or important part of something
    Example:

    Trust is the bedrock of a strong friendship.


  5. ratify / ˈræt əˌfaɪ / (v.) – to officially approve or accept an agreement or decision, usually by a government or an organization
    Example:

    The law was ratified after months of debate about its impact on the public.


Article

Read the text below.

President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the entire United Nations climate-fighting apparatus takes America’s environmental isolation to another level and is likely to damage both the United States and the world as the planet flirts with ecological tipping points, experts say.


Leaders from around the world say the United States will be left behind as more than 190 other nations join in what they call a blossoming green economy that is transitioning from polluting coal, oil, and gas to cleaner and cheaper solar, wind, and other renewable energies.


The action on January 7 starts the process to pull the U.S. out of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It’s the main way nations negotiate, monitor, and enforce agreements to curb worsening climate change, and is a bigger step than Trump’s 2017 and 2025 withdrawals from the bedrock 2015 Paris Agreement aimed at limiting warming.


The framework was negotiated in Brazil in 1992, championed by Republican U.S. President George H.W. Bush, and ratified unanimously by the U.S. Senate. It’s what Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden used to justify signing and reactivating the Paris deal without needing Senate approval. The Trump administration also withdrew from a United Nations climate science panel, a biodiversity-saving effort, and the Green Climate Fund to help poor nations, as well as many other international collaborations.


“It is a more serious step, definitely. The world loses a lot, and it is very damaging,” said Johan Rockstrom, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. “The U.S. turns its back against science, against global collaboration, against any kind of action on climate change. So, yes, in that sense, it’s more fundamental and more damaging” than earlier efforts.


Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in announcing the U.S. withdrawal, said the Trump administration “has found these institutions to be redundant in their scope, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful, poorly run, captured by the interests of actors advancing their own agendas contrary to our own, or a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity.”


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The United States has withdrawn from important international climate agreements, while other countries continue to work together to fight climate change. How do you think withdrawing from global agreements affects a country’s image? Do you think a country can protect its environment on its own? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • What happens when a country ignores global climate efforts while other nations take action? How might this affect trade, tourism, or international relationships? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. withdrew from international climate institutions because they were “redundant, mismanaged, and unnecessary.” Do you agree that finding problems in these institutions is enough reason to leave? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • If a country thinks international institutions are poorly run or wasteful, what could it do instead of withdrawing? How could it work to improve them or influence change? Discuss.