FDA limits toxic lead in some baby foods

Category: Health

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. neurological / ˌnjʊr əˈlɑdʒ i kəl / (adj.) – relating to the body’s nervous system that includes the brain, spinal cord, and nerves
    Example:

    He needed several months of treatment because of the neurological injuries he got from the car accident.


  2. mandatory / ˈmæn dəˌtɔr i / (adj.) – relating to something that is required by law, rule, or authority; necessary
    Example:

    Some vaccines are mandatory in certain countries.


  3. contaminant / kənˈtæm ə nənt / (n.) – a material that makes something dirty and unsafe for use
    Example:

    The factory was shut down after contaminants were discovered in their ingredients.


  4. a step forward / ə stɛp ˈfɔr wərd / (idiom) – an improvement, progress, or development
    Example:

    The new policy is a step forward in reducing pollution in the city.


  5. feasibility / ˌfi zəˈbɪl ɪ ti / (n.) – the possibility of something being achieved, accomplished, or completed
    Example:

    The project’s feasibility depends on getting enough funds from the management.


Article

Read the text below.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set maximum levels for lead in baby foods like jarred fruits and vegetables, yogurts and dry cereal, part of an effort to cut young kids’ exposure to the toxic metal that causes developmental and neurological problems.


The agency issued final guidance that it estimated could reduce lead exposure from processed baby foods by about 20% to 30%. The limits are voluntary, not mandatory, for food manufacturers, but they allow the FDA to take enforcement action if foods exceed the levels.


It’s part of the FDA’s ongoing effort to “reduce dietary exposure to contaminants, including lead, in foods to as low as possible over time, while maintaining access to nutritious foods,” the agency said in a statement.


Consumer advocates, who have long sought limits on lead in children’s foods, welcomed the guidance first proposed two years ago, but said it didn’t go far enough.


“FDA’s actions today are a step forward and will help protect children,” said Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest. “However, the agency took too long to act and ignored important public input that could have strengthened these standards.”


The new limits on lead for children younger than two don’t cover grain-based snacks like puffs and teething biscuits, which some research has shown contain higher levels of lead. And they don’t limit other metals such as cadmium that have been detected in baby foods.


Brian Ronholm, director of food policy for Consumer Reports, called the limits “virtually meaningless because they’re based more on industry feasibility and not on what would best protect public health.”


A spokesperson for baby food maker Gerber said the company’s products meet the limits.


There’s no safe level of lead exposure for children, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The metal causes “well-documented health effects,” including brain and nervous system damage and slowed growth and development. However, lead occurs naturally in some foods and comes from pollutants in air, water and soil, which can make it impossible to eliminate entirely.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Food manufacturers are encouraged, but not required, to follow the lead limits set by the FDA. Do you think it is okay to make the lead limits voluntary for food manufacturers to follow instead of mandatory? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • If you were caring for a child, how would knowing that the lead limits are voluntary change how you choose the baby food products you buy? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Lead is found naturally in soil and water, so it may be impossible to remove or reduce its presence in food completely. Is it better for the government to set rules that help keep lead in food very low, or should they find ways to remove it even if it’s difficult? Which option do you think is better? Why? Discuss.
  • If a small amount of lead is unavoidable in food, what actions should food manufacturers and the government take to educate and protect the public? In your country, do you think the public is well-informed about the negative effects of lead on people’s health? Why or why not? Discuss.