Germany plans to enable underground storage of carbon dioxide at offshore sites

Category: Science/Environment

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. offshore / ˈɔfˈʃɔr / (adj.) – in or under the ocean, away from the coast or shore
    Example:

    The company decided to build an offshore wind farm to use renewable energy from the ocean.


  2. chancellor / ˈtʃæn sə lər / (n.) – a senior state or legal official, often responsible for finance or justice
    Example:

    The chancellor of Germany plays a significant role in shaping the country’s economic policies and decisions.


  3. abate / əˈbeɪt / (v.) – to become less intense or widespread
    Example:

    After the storm passed, the wind began to abate, and the rain gradually stopped.


  4. foresee / fɔrˈsi / (v.) – to predict something before it happens
    Example:

    The research and development team can foresee remarkable innovations in smartphone technology in the next few years.


  5. run out / rʌn aʊt / (phrasal v.) – to use up all of something that nothing is left
    Example:

    The concert tickets were in such high demand that they had run out within minutes of going on sale.


Article

Read the text below.

Germany plans to enable underground carbon storage at offshore sites, pushing ahead with a much-discussed technology in an acknowledgment that time is running out to combat climate change, the country’s vice chancellor said.


Europe’s biggest economy is making good progress with expanding renewable energy sources and usage, but a solution is needed for the carbon dioxide emitted by some sectors such as the cement industry that are “hard to abate,” said Robert Habeck, who is also the economy and climate minister.


Habeck’s proposed “carbon management strategy,” which still needs to be turned into detailed legislation, foresees enabling the transport of carbon dioxide and its storage under the sea in Germany’s exclusive economic zone, except in marine conservation areas. It doesn’t foresee allowing storage sites on land, but Habeck said that could be considered later if German state governments approve.


Opponents maintain that so-called carbon capture and storage is unproven at scale and has been less effective than alternatives such as solar and wind at decarbonizing the energy sector.


Habeck, a member of the environmentalist Green party, recalled opposition to carbon storage when it was discussed in the 2000s. But he said, “The technology has been developed further … and from my point of view it is mature and safe,” and that it is now being used elsewhere, not just in research projects.


Neighboring Denmark last year launched an ambitious project that aims to bury vast amounts of carbon dioxide beneath the North Sea.


“Time has run out,” Habeck said at a news conference in Berlin. “In the 2000s, you could perhaps say, ‘let’s wait and see what might happen.’ Today we see that we haven’t found any technological solution for cement and other areas that ensures climate neutrality.”


“We are heading toward exceeding 1.5 degrees, which means that we are no longer in a luxury or comfort zone where we can somehow wait,” Habeck added. “We have to use what we have.”


He was referencing the international goal of trying to limit future warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • What do you think will happen now that time has run out for people to address climate change? Discuss.
  • Habeck said that “we have to use what we have” to address climate change. What do you think your country has right now that can be used to help address climate change (ex. renewable energy sources, public awareness)? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Does your country have clear environmental goals? How important is it for a country to have environmental goals? Discuss.
  • Why do you think many people are still in their comfort zone when it comes to addressing climate change? Is this true in your country as well? What makes you say so? Discuss.