Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons

印刷用画面を開く

Posted

Category: Technology/Innovations

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. bad actor / bæd ˈæk tər / (n.) – a person, group, or organization that intentionally breaks rules, commits crimes, or causes harm to others
    Example:

    The company worked with global leaders to block bad actors from buying dangerous chemicals.


  2. cyberattack / ˈsaɪ bər əˌtæk / (n.) – an illegal attempt by online criminals to damage, stop, or steal information from a computer system or network using the internet
    Example:

    Hundreds of flights were delayed after a cyberattack disabled the airline’s airport control system.


  3. snippet / ˈsnɪp ɪt / (n.) – a small piece or short part of something, such as information, text, or news
    Example:

    You can read a small snippet of the new book for free on the store’s website.


  4. echo / ˈɛk oʊ / (v.) – to repeat or express an idea, opinion, or feeling that agrees with what someone else has already said
    Example:

    The researcher echoed concerns raised by other experts about the safety of new technology.


  5. spyware / ˈspaɪˌwɛər / (n.) – computer software that secretly collects personal information or watches how someone uses a computer without permission
    Example:

    Some spyware can secretly record bank passwords when people type them online.


Article

Read the text below.

Anthropic said it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons.


As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills, and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons.


“The cases we share here aren’t typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we’ve identified to date,” Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse.


“We’re publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society’s defenders act to make them safer,” the company said.


The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published two days after one of its researchers announced he’s resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology’s potential to elude human control.


Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and “politically motivated individuals” to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda.


Among the findings in the company’s report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude’s assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The article reports that bad actors tried to use artificial intelligence for malicious activities, such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could lead to biological weapons. In your opinion, how should tech companies address the possible misuse of technology? Do you think there is something tech companies and global leaders can do to prevent bad actors from using AI to do these acts? Why or why not? Discuss.
  • If a powerful technology has the potential to cause serious real-world harm, who do you think should be held responsible if something goes wrong: the creators of the AI or the user? Why? What personal rules or limits do you set for yourself when using powerful digital tools in your everyday life? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • The article mentions that a researcher resigned over concerns that tech companies are not acting responsibly and that the technology could get out of human control. When former employees and startups speak out about safety risks in an industry, how much trust should the public put in their warnings? Why might people hesitate to trust these warnings? Discuss.
  • If you worked for a tech company and noticed that a product you were helping build could be dangerous or harmful to society, how would you respond? Would you continue working there and fix it, or leave the company? Why do you say so? Discuss.