Study says climate change doubled odds of big Canada fires, not mismanagement

Category: Science/Environment

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. double / ˈdʌb əl / (v.) – to become twice as much or to make something twice as much
    Example:

    The number of visitors doubled after the museum reopened.


  2. tinderbox / ˈtɪn dərˌbɒks / (n.) – a situation that could quickly become dangerous or cause serious problems
    Example:

    The area became a tinderbox after months of drought and extreme heat.


  3. emission / ɪˈmɪʃ ən / (n.) – an amount of gas, heat, light, or other substance released into the air that can damage the environment
    Example:

    The government is working to reduce carbon emissions from vehicles.


  4. humidity / hjuˈmɪd ɪ ti / (n.) – the amount of moisture or water in the air
    Example:

    The high humidity makes the summer weather feel hotter.


  5. scientifically / ˌsaɪ ənˈtɪf ɪk li / (adv.) – in a way that is based on scientific methods, knowledge, or evidence
    Example:

    The researchers scientifically tested the new treatment before recommending it.


Article

Read the text below.

A new study calculates that human-caused climate change doubled the likelihood of the tinderbox weather conditions that sparked Canada’s massive summer wildfires, which sent smoke everywhere and raised the ire of some politicians.


Fire and climate scientists said some politicians, who have talked about punishing Canada for poor fire management, should look more in the mirror than up north when it comes to blame, given the United States’ huge historical emissions of heat-trapping gases from the burning of coal, oil, and gas.


The fire weather conditions in Northwest Territories and northwestern Ontario, while unusual, weren’t that rare, but still were made twice as likely by global warming, according to a study by World Weather Attribution, a group of international scientists who examine extreme weather conditions to see if there are climate change fingerprints. It’s about the same as the team found for summer fires in France, but not nearly as clear a climate fingerprint as they calculated in Spanish fires, which the scientists said were 20 times more likely because of climate change.


The study, which was done so quickly that it has not been peer-reviewed yet, looked at the weather conditions that are connected to large wildfires and the Canadian index for those conditions, which are heat, lack of rain, humidity, and wind. The researchers found the doubling of frequency when—using scientifically accepted techniques to search for climate fingerprints—they compared current conditions to a world without the 2.5 degrees (1.4 °C) of warming that’s occurred since the industrial age and the burning of fossil fuels started. The weeklong weather conditions that led to the fires in Ontario are now the type that can happen every six years or so, the report said.


“In a pre-industrial climate, this would have been much less likely to occur, maybe once in a lifespan. So, climate change has made those events more likely,” said study co-author Jonathan Boucher, a fire scientist at the Canadian Forest Service.


Outside climate and fire scientists said the flash study made sense and reflects a world where hotter and drier conditions are making fires burn more often and more intensely.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The study suggests that human-caused climate change made the weather conditions behind the Canadian fires twice as likely. Some scientists also said the U.S. should consider its own history of greenhouse-gas emissions before blaming Canada. When a problem affects more than one country, how should responsibility be shared? Discuss.
  • Some politicians have talked about punishing Canada for poor fire management, but scientists say they should look more in the mirror when it comes to blame. At this point, in which massive wildfires occur in several locations, do you think it’s important to determine who should be blamed? Why or why not? What do you think country leaders should prioritize now that there are more massive wildfires? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • According to outside climate and fire scientists, the flash study reflects a world where hotter and drier conditions are making fires burn more often and more intensely. What do you think will happen to future generations if this prediction comes true? Discuss.
  • In your opinion, what small and big actions should be done now to reverse the damage of climate change for future generations? Discuss.