Johnson & Johnson proposes $5.5 billion talc settlement to end marathon legal fight

Category: Business

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. tort / tɔrt / (n.) – an unfair or bad action that hurts someone or damages their property, which can be settled in a civil court instead of a court for serious crimes
    Example:

    The company faced a major tort case after its product caused an injury to customers.


  2. appeal / əˈpil / (v.) – to formally ask a higher court of law to change a decision made by a lower court
    Example:

    The company decided to appeal the court’s decision after losing the case.


  3. untenable / ʌnˈtɛn ə bəl / (adj.) – impossible to defend, support, or continue because of bad conditions, a lack of proof, or a lack of logic
    Example:

    Asking workers to finish the huge project in just two hours put them in an untenable position.


  4. causation / kɔˈzeɪ ʃən / (n.) – the direct relationship in which one event or action makes another thing happen
    Example:

    Scientists are working hard to prove causation in local health issues caused by pollution.


  5. litigation / ˌlɪt ɪˈgeɪ ʃən / (n.) – the official process of making or defending a legal claim in a court of law
    Example:

    Both sides involved in the case may face years of litigation if they cannot agree.


Article

Read the text below.

Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay $5.5 billion to tie up remaining lawsuits that claim its talc products caused ovarian cancer.


The drugmaker, which has been fighting talc-related lawsuits for more than a decade, said that the settlement is conditioned on at least 95% of remaining claimants participating.


A U.S. bankruptcy court judge denied a $9 billion settlement proposed by company subsidiary Red River Talc last year that would have been one of the biggest mass tort settlements in history.


Johnson & Johnson decided not to appeal that ruling and instead fight on in court.


A federal judge ordered plaintiffs in the case against Johnson & Johnson to show why the remaining pending talc claims should not be dismissed after their witnesses could not provide a direct link between the company’s product and cancer.


“The Court’s order placed plaintiffs in an untenable position of having to present specific causation evidence to maintain their claims that does not exist,” Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation, Johnson & Johnson, said in a prepared statement.


As part of the settlement proposed, Johnson & Johnson will make an initial payment of no more than $3 billion next year. It has no additional payments due until 2028.


“While we are confident the company would have ultimately prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it and remain focused on its mission to develop medicines and devices that save lives,” Haas said.


Johnson & Johnson said that it previously settled about 95% of filed lawsuits for mesothelioma, a cancer in the tissue surrounding organs like the lungs and heart, all state consumer protection claims, and all talc-supplier disputes.


Shares of the New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company rose more than 2% before the market open on July 28.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • When a well-known healthcare company faces long court battles over health claims, how does it affect your trust in their products? Discuss.
  • Do you think healthcare companies facing major health claims should be allowed to operate freely while waiting for lawsuits to end? Why or why not? Should all of their products be stopped from being sold while the lawsuit is ongoing? Why do you say so? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • A federal judge ordered plaintiffs to show direct proof linking the product to cancer, which company leaders said does not exist. How important is it to provide a direct link between a product and an illness? How do you think this affects users who got sick but cannot provide this direct proof? Discuss.
  • If you were a business owner, would you keep fighting in court to prove your company is innocent, or pay money to settle so you can focus on your business? Why do you say so? Discuss.