South Korean law targeting ‘fake news’ takes effect as journalist groups raise concerns

Category: Top Stories

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. punitive / ˈpju nɪ tɪv / (adj.) – intended to punish someone or something
    Example:

    The company had to pay punitive damages after losing the court case.


  2. adequate / ˈæd ɪ kwɪt / (adj.) – enough for some need or requirement
    Example:

    The hotel has adequate space for all 300 guests.


  3. fabricated / ˈfæb rɪˌkeɪ tɪd / (adj.) – false or invented to deceive someone
    Example:

    The story he told the police was completely fabricated.


  4. boycott / ˈbɔɪ kɒt / (n.) – the act of refusing to buy a product, do business with a company, or take part in an activity as a way of protest
    Example:

    Many customers joined the boycott against the company.


  5. dispute / dɪˈspjut / (n.) – an argument or a disagreement, especially an official one
    Example:

    The two countries had a long dispute over the border.


Article

Read the text below.

South Korea began enforcing a law that allows steep punitive damages against news outlets and social media influencers for spreading false information, as journalist groups warned it could chill public discourse and invite censorship.


Journalists and civil liberties groups say the vaguely worded law fails to clearly define what information it prohibits and lacks adequate safeguards for the media, warning it could potentially discourage critical reporting about government officials, politicians, and large businesses.


The law allows courts to award damages of up to five times the proven losses against news organizations and large social media channels, including YouTube creators, that circulate illegal, false, or manipulated information to cause harm or generate profit.


In addition, those who distribute information more than twice after a court has confirmed it to be false or manipulated could be fined up to 1 billion won ($656,000) by the country’s media regulator. Internet companies operating large social media platforms with more than 1 million daily users are required to take measures such as removing content or suspending user accounts when they receive reports of false or fabricated information.


The law was backed by President Lee Jae Myung’s liberal Democratic Party and passed by the National Assembly in December over a boycott by the conservative opposition. The liberals, who unsuccessfully sought to pass similar legislation under previous governments, say the law is necessary to combat fake news and disinformation, which they argue is posing a growing threat to democracy by fueling division and hate speech.


The Journalists Association of Korea said the mere prospect of news organizations repeatedly facing massive damage claims or legal disputes could have an “unavoidable chilling effect.”


“Even if a law’s objective is legitimate, it could erode the foundations of democracy if it’s enforced in a way that discourages the media and ordinary citizens from freely criticizing and scrutinizing those in power,” the group said in a statement.


The Seoul Foreign Correspondents’ Club also expressed concern about the potential impact on the work of the media and the free flow of information.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • In your opinion, how serious is the problem of fake news or false information? Give an example of its bad effects on the public. Discuss.
  • Based on the new law in South Korea, news outlets and social media influencers can receive steep punitive damages for spreading false information. Do you think such punishments are enough to discourage groups and people from spreading fake news? Why or why not? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • The Journalists Association of Korea said the law could have an “unavoidable chilling effect.” What do you think “a chilling effect” means? How can this law affect the fairness of reporting and freely criticizing people in power? Discuss.
  • In your opinion, how important is it for news organizations to freely criticize powerful people and groups, such as government officials, politicians, and large businesses? Discuss.