Australia to double potential fines for Facebook and Instagram over child social media accounts

Category: Education/Family

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. toughen / ˈtʌf ən / (v.) – to make a rule or law stricter or stronger
    Example:

    The school decided to toughen its rules on smartphone use during class.


  2. amendment / əˈmɛnd mənt / (n.) – a change, addition, or improvement made to a law, rule, or official document
    Example:

    After an accident at a factory, the government introduced amendments to the safety laws to protect workers.


  3. circumvent / ˌsɜr kəmˈvɛnt / (v.) – to find a smart, illegal, or dishonest way to avoid a rule or law instead of following it
    Example:

    He used a fake ID to circumvent the law against young people buying alcohol.


  4. deficient / dɪˈfɪʃ ənt / (adj.) – not good enough because it is missing something important that it needs to work correctly
    Example:

    The company lost a lot of money because it had a deficient business plan.


  5. implement / ˈɪm plə mənt / (v.) – to start using a plan, rule, system, or law to make it active
    Example:

    The city decided to implement a plan to build more parks for families.


Article

Read the text below.

Australia plans to double potential fines for social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, that fail to prevent Australian children from holding accounts, as critics argue the world-first ban on under-16s was failing.


Communications Minister Anika Wells blamed the platforms’ resistance to the age restrictions for the need to toughen the laws that came into force on December 10.


“We can all agree we would like the scheme to work better than it is currently, but that is on Big Tech taking the Mickey,” Wells told the Australian Broadcasting Corp., using an Australian slang term for deceiving, teasing, or mocking.


The government announced it would introduce draft legislation into Parliament that would double the maximum fine to 99 million Australian dollars ($68 million) for platforms that fail to take reasonable steps to prevent Australian children from holding accounts.


The amendments would also increase the powers of eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s online safety watchdog, to demand information and documents to ensure platforms were complying with Australian law, a government statement said.


The new powers would also include information from third parties, such as age assurance technology providers, to test claims made by the platforms about how those under 16 continued to circumvent the ban, the statement said.


Senior opposition lawmaker Jane Hume said her party would consider voting for the reforms, saying the “social media ban wasn’t working” because of deficient laws. “The legislation was clearly undercooked in the first place. The eSafety Commissioner wasn’t given the powers to be able to pursue these Big Tech companies,” Hume said.


Parliament passed the initial legislation with overwhelming support in 2024. The targeted platforms were given more than 12 months to plan and implement the ban.


Many countries that have implemented or are planning similar restrictions have been closely watching the progress of Australia’s ban.


The government initially reported that more than 5 million children had accounts removed, deactivated, or restricted after the ban became law. But eSafety reported in March that seven in 10 children who held accounts on restricted platforms on December 10 remained on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • Australia plans to double potential fines for social media platforms that fail to prevent children from holding accounts. Do you think doubling the fines will successfully solve the problem and make these companies follow the rules? Why or why not? When a law is not working, do you think increasing the financial punishment is the best way to fix it? Discuss.
  • Why do you think laws like this face so much trouble? In your opinion, is the ban failing because the initial fines were not high enough, or is a ban like this naturally too difficult to make people follow? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • What do you think is the value of social media and social media platforms? Discuss.
  • Critics argue that the world-first ban on under-16s was failing. Which do you think can solve the issue: totally ban social media for all ages or screen social media to remove harmful content? What are the advantages and disadvantages of your choice? Discuss.