AI is plowing through the workplace. This new group wants to help people adapt and have jobs

Category: Technology/Innovations

Listening

Unlocking Word Meanings

Read the following words/expressions found in today’s article.

  1. doomsday scenario / ˈdumzˌdeɪ sɪˈnɛər iˌoʊ / (n.) – a possible future situation or event in which everything goes completely wrong, causing massive damage, destruction, or total disaster
    Example:

    Scientists warn of a doomsday scenario in which rising sea levels completely flood major coastal cities.


  2. backer / ˈbæk ər / (n.) – a person or group that helps and supports someone or something, usually with money or words
    Example:

    The mayor is a strong backer of the new park project because he loves outdoor activities.


  3. layoff / ˈleɪˌɔf / (n.) – a situation in which a company ends a worker's job to save money or because there is not enough work
    Example:

    Employees are worried about layoffs because the business has been losing money all year.


  4. destabilize / diˈsteɪ bəˌlaɪz / (v.) – to make a government, country, or economic situation weak, not safe, or unable to control events properly by causing problems
    Example:

    Bad leadership can destabilize even the strongest organizations.


  5. crumble / ˈkrʌm bəl / (v.) – to become very weak, break down, or fail completely after being strong
    Example:

    The team’s confidence began to crumble after they lost three games in a row.


Article

Read the text below.

America has been rushing into an artificial intelligence future without much of a plan to stop what could be catastrophic job losses. Critics warn of doomsday scenarios out of a sci-fi thriller, while backers say AI will generate so much new wealth that no one should worry too much about millions of layoffs.


A new bipartisan nonprofit hopes to ensure that America can realize the economic gains promised by AI without its workers suffering.


RAISE US is starting with more than $500 million to deploy on new forms of education and training, putting a focus on partnering with states and major employers rather than the federal government.


Founded by former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, a Democrat, and former Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican, the group aims to pilot programs and incentives to help American workers pivot to new careers in an economy that will increasingly be automated by artificial intelligence.


“We’re talking about a certain level of unemployment that could destabilize our country and our democracy,” Raimondo said in an interview. “If you want to lead the world in AI, you have to take action to make sure our democracy doesn’t crumble.”


The nonprofit is initially partnering with officials in Arkansas, Connecticut, Maryland, and Utah, along with several of America’s largest companies and charitable organizations. The group intends to develop policies that connect schools more closely to employers, so that layoffs can be replaced by the potential for new jobs with higher incomes. They are also exploring changes to corporate taxes and other incentives with the goal of keeping people working.


“Good things tend to happen when you convert have-nots into haves,” Holcomb said.


Among the companies serving as anchor partners with RAISE US are Amazon, Microsoft, Anthropic, the OpenAI Foundation, and Bank of America. Other employers involved in the project include UPS, General Motors, Eli Lilly, Mastercard, chipmaker AMD, Cisco, and IBM.


This article was provided by The Associated Press.


Viewpoint Discussion

Enjoy a discussion with your tutor.

Discussion A

  • The article mentions that America has been rushing into an artificial intelligence future without much of a plan to stop catastrophic job losses. Which do you prefer for your country: to develop AI fast but with a lot of job losses, or to develop AI slowly but ensure that people will not lose jobs? Why do you say so? What kind of problems might happen if a country moves too fast or too slowly? Discuss.
  • The new group, RAISE US, is starting with more than $500 million to deploy on new forms of education and training, helping workers pivot to new careers. If you were offered a free program to learn a completely new job, would you take it? Why or why not? Do you believe these new forms of education and training are enough to fix the catastrophic job losses caused by AI? Discuss.

Discussion B

  • Backers say AI will generate so much new wealth that no one should worry too much about millions of layoffs. Do you agree or disagree with these backers? Why do you say so? Who do you think will actually benefit the most from this new wealth? Discuss.
  • If AI really does generate an enormous amount of new wealth for the economy, how should this money be used to help the workers who were laid off? Do you think the government should use this wealth to give financial aid to everyone, or should it only be used to create new types of jobs? What is the fairest way to share this wealth? Discuss.